A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision on digital location data could have significant implications for the future of government surveillance and Fourth Amendment protections.
In a recent Cleveland.com article, Flannery | Georgalis Counsel, Benjamin Reese, discusses the Supreme Court’s decision and its potential implications for the appeal of United States v. Sturdivant, where the government’s warrantless use of automated license plate reader data raises important constitutional questions at the intersection of emerging technology and individual privacy. As surveillance technology continues to evolve, so too will the constitutional questions surrounding how the government collects, aggregates, and uses personal data.
At Flannery | Georgalis, our Critical Motions and Appeals Team brings deep experience to complex constitutional and appellate matters. Whether challenging government action, preserving critical issues for appeal, or defending fundamental rights, our elite attorneys are committed to protecting our clients and the constitutional principles that protect us all.
To read more about this ruling: SCOTUS geofence ruling puts Flock cameras in legal crosshairs, experts say – cleveland.com